Best Learning Systems

Simple Breakdown: Top 10 Learning Systems 2024

Author
Admin
Heritage eLearning
January 3, 2025 7 min read
Simple Breakdown: Top 10 Learning Systems 2024
Summary

Top 10 Learning Systems of 2024: Key Insights & Rankings

As 2024 approaches, the learning technology industry has seen significant advancements, with competition among the top systems tighter than ever. The rankings highlight various platforms excelling in employee development, customer training, and skills-based learning.

Key Trends & Insights

  • Narrow Margins & Ties—The competition was razor-thin, with several systems tied in rankings, reflecting the industry’s rapid evolution.
  • Diverse Solutions – The list includes platforms catering to enterprises, customer education, and upskilling.
  • AI’s Role – While some vendors integrate AI for personalization and automation, AI adoption did not influence the final rankings.

Top 10 Learning Systems of 2024

  1. Learn Amp – Best for employee development, featuring a modern UI/UX and powerful reporting.
  2. Cornerstone OnDemand – Strong in skill management, mobile learning, and user-friendly design.
  3. Docebo LMS – Notable for extensive features and AI-driven content delivery.
  4. Thought Industries – Excels in customer training but could improve data metrics.
  5. LearnUpon & D2L for Business (Tied) – Both are praised for streamlined administration and customer training.
  6. Eurekos – Effective in customer training with a strong focus on analytics, preparing for future AI integration.
  7. CYPHER Learning & 360Learning (Tied) – Stand out for collaboration-driven learning and user engagement.
  8. Learnster – Uses AI for highly personalized learning experiences.
  9. Hive Perform – Specializes in sales training with AI-driven practical scenarios.
  10. Skillable – Known for its hands-on lab-building tools but needs improvements in user engagement.

With these innovations, the learning technology space is set for even more significant transformations heading into 2025.

  • Combo—This is the most common type of system in the industry. It focuses on internal (L&D, employees) and external (Training, and what I wrote up around CS) aspects. The system always skews one way (internal) or the other (external). And yes, it is common to have a combo system that offers multi-tenant—aka parent-child.

I did not place in verticals (because vendors always say we do all these verticals or they pick and choose, but if a MONSTERXTW company with 500,000 users that isn’t in their vertical comes knocking at the door, my money is on them taking MonsterX).  

Not everyone can just jump into a lab and figure it all out. And frankly, I don’t believe that the administrator—or whoever is tasked with creating the lab or its content—can either.

When it comes to training people or Learning and Development, there’s often an assumption that IT will handle it. But let me be clear: this is a scenario I absolutely do not recommend.

So, what is Skillable Studio?

At its core, Skillable Studio is an authoring tool designed specifically for creating labs.

However, it goes far beyond the basics.

When you use Studio, you also gain access to analytics tied directly to its usage, offering valuable insights.

Other standout features include:

These templates are particularly useful for individuals who prefer ready-made solutions but still want the flexibility to customize. Think of them as tools to support tailored training and instructional design, helping you develop guided lab experiences that meet diverse needs.

If gamification is on your radar, Skillable incorporates it seamlessly into its labs.

That said, it is not without its challenges.

While Skillable’s UI/UX is solid, they still need some refinement.

Specifically, the platform falls a bit short in terms of learner engagement—something I believe users would greatly appreciate.

Another point of contention for me is the option to bring in content from third-party vendors.

  • Create Learner – Anyone can see this and go, okay, click
  • Create Learning Initiative
  • Create Featured Playlist

#9 Hive Perform by Hive Learning (Combo, internal and external)

#8 Learnster (Combo) (FAL)

  • You want AI – here you go. Yes, we are still in the baby stage with AI – nevertheless, they lead the industry
  • Learning Companion – The companion is all about informal learning, whereas a learner using AI can choose text, quizzes, learning casts, and other formats that suit the way they learn. This includes thereafter learning paths for that specific learner – HUGE
  • The ability to select a variety of synthetic voices for your personal agent, including specific accents. Do you want an agent to have a British accent? You can.
  • Remixes are the coolest capability I have seen, period. A learner using their space can select a variety of pieces of content, including say podcasts (coming in 2025)—but I mention it here only because of how this works—and remix them in a different journey. Thus, maybe organizational content, third-party courses, PDFs, audio files, and remix. I love it.
  • When using AI – you choose your companion mode – Scholar, Coach, Expert – the system is all about learners first – which it should be. And individuality – rather than the assumption, let’s push out content and quizzes for everyone – assuming everyone learns the same way.
  • Compliance capabilities – Data visualization and the key information you need to know
  • The home page, while currently resembling a common layout seen in platforms like Netflix, is in need of a fresh and innovative approach. The industry is saturated with similar designs, and it’s time to break the mold. Inspire with something new and exciting.
  • Better metrics—the internal is solid, customer training? Not so much. Plus, on the metrics side as a whole, ensure it tells me my learning story.

#7 (tie) 360Learning (Combo, but skews internal)

  • Their mobile app is the highest-rated app for learning systems on Google Play and iTunes.

But this system, while it offers many whams across the platform, does have a few warts.

  • The metrics for activities include “views” – you already know my feelings there.
  • The system’s SCORM feature, while functional, could be more user-friendly.
  • It’s not immediately clear that the system supports SCORM 1.2, SCORM 2004 3rd edition, and SCORM—xAPI until you click SCORM.
  • This lack of clarity could be improved.
  • The collaborator’s aspect, even after I was shown how it worked, left me with some concerns.
  • I didn’t see a comprehensive list of their capabilities within the system, which made me feel uncertain.
  • The lack of visible metrics to gauge their success or failure on the learner side seems like a missed opportunity for improvement.

#7 (tie) CYPHER Learning (Combo) (FAL)

  • The task journey feature, located on the right side of the screen, is a valuable tool that guides users through tasks, enhancing their learning experience.The content creator, listed as a course, offers a range of options including gamify, writing style, persona, and synthetic audio, each designed to enhance and personalize course content.The writing style was also engaging. There were a few options, but I didn’t see where I could see what each style “looks” like. A hover item would suffice.
  • The admin side was both a plus and a minus. There were a lot of options on the plus side, but I felt it could have been streamlined.
  • The whole copilot mechanism played off, IMO, is the term itself. Does copilot have a place in the AI industry since Microsoft led the charge? It has some issues. And why would I want it when a personalized agent can go way beyond copilot – now, and I believe as AI evolves.
  • Gamification was another winner—from the standpoint that you could offer it in ways such as optional tasks people have to do—although there are potential consequences.
  • From the Gamify standpoint, I did find that different departments, for example, can create their own learning games
  • AI may produce fake or false information, so check before accepting it. It appears in various places on the admin side.
  • UI/UX is slick
  • Skills are strong in terms of approach, design, and output.
  • I like using Multiple LLMs, rather than the common method I see, where vendors are using only one
  • Under the content creator (again, they note this as a course), I was baffled as to why traditional educators and another type of educator were listed. If I am targeting corporate, why would I select educator, which is a higher education and even a primary/secondary option?
  • I didn’t like the option of having this as a micro-learning course because the term alone is misleading. Anybody at any time, even back in 1999, could create a short – mini-course. I get that people still think this is “magical” because some vendors push this term or state their platform is a micro-learning platform. Always remember that short means short, and the duration will differ depending on what the learner wants to do in the course. Anyway, short never means good.
  • AI cross-check is interesting, but for all the info about notifying people about fake or false information, it doesn’t appear with cross-check
  • Metrics need improvements
  • I’m not a fan of the fact that depending on whether or not it is successful in terms of features or capabilities rolled out using learners/admin, etc., it will get shelved.
  • It implies that you are not the expert – which is what you will assume when you buy the system.

#6 Absorb LMS (Combo) (FAL)

#6 Eurekos (External, including Associations) (FAL)

Wins:

  • Tax management
  • Incentives – Huge fan of tapping gamification into a reward store – where learners can get well rewarded. Adults love that.
  • Analytics that tell me my learning story
  • Unlimited multi-tenants (i.e., parent-child – children – also known as extended enterprise
  • Never a fee for you wanting/using customer training – multi-tenant (aka extended enterprise)
  • Robust system at a very affordable price point

#5 LearnUpon (FAL) (Combo including associations)

#5 D2L for Business (Combo including associations, entering L&D segment)

A two-way tie – LearnUpon, and D2L for Business

In no particular i.e. order, like why is X ahead of Y?

Because I just wrote it that way.

LearnUpon

Learner Home Page, Admin page

  • D2L’s extensive set of metrics and data is not just a feature, but a practical tool that tells your learning story. Functionality-wise, it matches the well-known players in the market that people perceive as leaders in the various segments
  • It is way better than Crowd Wisdom, the leader for reasons I still can’t figure out beyond it is tied to an association management platform – which FWIW D2L can tap integrate with too – plus any other association management platforms too (I should note that D2L has a system for associations, which I love as well)
  • D2L is the #1 learning system for the association market, three years running
  • They play strongly in the customer training market, with, wait for it – unlimited multi-tenant (parent-child, i.e., unlimited children). Do you know how many vendors do this? I can tell you, not many. In fact, on my top 10, three – including D2L. You may think, well, that is a lot – but seriously, beyond those three, not an extensive list does. Minute is the right word.
  • Content Creator+ offers lots of options to deliver content. One factor in its power is the acquisition of H5P, which does offer flexibility to those who want—well, have some ID skill sets.
  • Workforce development components that are easy to use and figure out—I kid you not, there are a lot of vendors whose WD options are easy to use —and ease of use are two terms that should not be combined as one.
  • Ease of use—on the learner and admin sides—is huge for the admin side. The learner is good, too, but the admin is big.
  • Their onboarding approach, identifying and training two additional folks who are not on the training side, is brilliant. If the admin or head of training wins the lotto, who is going to jump in and handle it? Not Barney in HRIS—unless Rubble is their last name.
  • The system’s robust data reporting for customer training is truly impressive, providing a wealth of information and insights.This executive Summary gives you a quick snapshot of your site, learners, and financial performance—right to the point data that you will need.
  • Their learner side’s functionality is strong and easy to use, to exist.
  • It is a very robust system that still understands who is overseeing it, including who is running training or whatever their title is. Customer training is overwhelmingly about making money, and having metrics that identify what is working is huge.
  • Early adopters of AI – and they are very aware of the pitfalls, and recognizing that we still have a long way to go
  • An admin “zone” where everything you need for a variety of tasks associated with customer training, and yes, L&D—internal—is available. You do not need to look for these options, as many systems require you to do so—and I am referencing specifically for VLT and ILT.
  • Dedicated project manager and implementation consultant – LOVE it.
  • Advanced Enhancement
  • Panorama
  • E-Commerce – I wish this was included as part of the system, without you having to pay extra for it – very robust with everything you will need, without having to go all over the place to find 3rd party pieces
  • Advanced integration – BI-Connector – should be an extra cost, along with other integrations – very common in the space to charge; some items should be included. IMO
Executive Summary

Top Three

  • Another vendor who added AI
  • E-commerce—you need it for customer training or any training you want to charge a fee for, even offering it as a freebie. Worse, you pay yearly for this privilege. If you are buying the system for customer training, give it to this use case for free. Simple.
  • Extended Enterprise is a legacy term since the key monsters in the space use either customer training or customer education. Anyway, it is a yearly fee, and they charge, I believe, to buy the number you want (on top of that). If my use case is customer training and I have five children, give it to me for free. Ditto if I have 25 children. There is a reason why, but this isn’t the time for it.
  • Salesforce—Nowadays, it is quite common in the industry to integrate and use your content, blah blah. I know of vendors who jumped into this before 2015. Ditto on the Microsoft Teams angle, too.

#2 Cornerstone OnDemand LMS (Combo, skews employees) (FAL)

  • Skills mapping with AI
  • Mentoring – with the usual deliciousness of the learner being matched with the mentor, based on whatever variables (options the mentoree) selects.

Can you tell me what your learning story is?

#1 Learn Amp (FAL) (Employees)

Bottom Line

There will be a version, second edition, available as a PDF arriving before the end of the month. It will cost you..NOTHING. It’s free but will have additional items such as updated images (when available – this requires vendor permission) and an AI synthetic voice – could it be mine (replaced by AI)?? – I say with a Jekyll like laugh!

The second version will be available by download – so you can share with colleagues.

I am aware of typos in this post – and rest assured that everything will be cleaned up by mid-next week (i.e. the 10th or so of Jan).

My goal was to publish this before the end of 2024, however, I wanted to provide as much depth an insight without this being an extensive report, that folks have to purchase to read or view.

For those keeping track – what you just read = 8,129 words, with an estimated read time of 49 minutes. Although for folks who skim, that means 10 minutes.

I’m fine with either. Take your time, take a few. The read time is based on a fancy reader thing I got, which I ignore, but since people always add “duration” to their course, and others mean it has to be, well, here is my fancy reader thing, and I added the duration, even though I promise to ignore it.

Just not the insight.

E-Learning 24/7

Related Articles

Leave a Comment